What’s inflation? The reply appears apparent: when issues get costlier, that’s inflation, and it’s unhealthy. However an alternate view is Milton Friedman’s. In a chat in 1963, the massively influential economist outlined inflation as “a gentle and sustained rise in costs” and added that “inflation is all the time and in every single place a financial phenomenon”.

The excellence issues. Think about two situations that may illuminate it. In each of them, client costs have elevated by 10 per cent over the previous yr.

In Inflation World, there’s an excessive amount of cash round. The whole lot is getting costlier at a lot the identical fee, together with labour. Along with your wages rising on the similar fee as costs, the state of affairs is disorienting and barely inconvenient, nevertheless it’s not a disaster. The primary danger is that inflation turns into self-perpetuating, and the primary accountability for fixing the issue lies with the central financial institution.

In Vitality Crunch World, the price of vitality has doubled. About 10 per cent of spending used to enter vitality; that’s now about 20 per cent. In Vitality Crunch World, the patron value index has nonetheless risen by 10 per cent, and the state of affairs is described by all respected reporters as “inflation of 10 per cent”, simply as in Inflation World.

However the improve in costs isn’t “regular”; it’s not widespread; and it’s unlikely to be “sustained”. The chance of a self-perpetuating vitality shock is small. It’s onerous to think about that we’d be spending 30 per cent of earnings on vitality subsequent yr, 40 per cent the yr after and 50 per cent the yr after that. However the harm is unhealthy sufficient; somewhat than being mildly disorienting, this can be a disaster. A primary necessity has change into unaffordable for a lot of.

In Inflation World, stuff solely appears costlier as a result of the value tags hold altering. That’s inflation. In Vitality Crunch World, stuff actually is costlier. I’d enterprise to recommend that’s not inflation — it’s a lot worse.

The identical distinction applies when issues get cheaper due to technological progress. Music is less expensive than it was once, as are laptops and photo voltaic panels. And by “cheaper” I don’t imply within the almost-meaningless sense that there are fewer digits on the value tag. I imply cheaper in the one method that basically issues, which is that they require fewer sources to provide and are subsequently reasonably priced in better portions to extra individuals.

Maybe I’m doomed to fail in my venture to disentangle actual value adjustments from inflation. The true world, in fact, accommodates components of each, so confusion is inevitable. We’re coping with a brief however very painful improve in the actual price of vitality and meals, as in Vitality Crunch World, however we have now additionally seen unfastened cash and broader will increase in costs, as in Inflation World.

However the two sources of upper costs require fairly completely different coverage responses. In Inflation World, inflation is a financial phenomenon and desires a financial response corresponding to increased rates of interest. In Vitality Crunch World, the rise in costs wants a real-world response within the type of assist for struggling households, and each effort to cut back demand and to seek out new sources of provide.

Go searching and also you’ll see loads of confusion on this level. Within the US, the just lately signed Inflation Discount Act is not any such factor. It guarantees to squeeze the value of pricy prescription drugs, give tax credit for low-carbon vitality sources and tighten some tax loopholes. These are promising insurance policies, but when they work they are going to work by bettering the construction of the actual economic system, not by tightening financial circumstances.

The identical logic applies to US proposals to toughen competitors coverage. If a monopoly is damaged up and its fats mark-ups diminished, the consequence needs to be that costs fall and incentives to enhance high quality and repair improve. That ought to imply a one-off increase in actual residing requirements, arguably way more vital than any impression on inflation. If it impacts inflation in any respect, it is going to be a brief blip — and “reduces inflation” by no means was, and by no means needs to be, the take a look at of competitors coverage.

Or take into account the concept of a common primary earnings. It’s usually attacked on the grounds that it’s inflationary, however there’s nothing significantly inflationary about elevating taxes and utilizing the cash to fund a primary earnings. The case in opposition to a primary earnings is nothing to do with inflation: it’s that these increased taxes plus the supply of unconditional money may produce an excessive amount of of a disincentive to work for too many individuals.

Friedman was oversimplifying when he declared that inflation was all the time and in every single place a financial phenomenon. However the assertion isn’t far incorrect and has a bracing readability. Should you attempt to consider clear vitality subsidies, assist for leading edge analysis, competitors coverage or tax reform by means of the lens of inflation-busting, you’re lacking the purpose. These insurance policies stand or fall on their real-world deserves.

In the meantime, the most effective long-run prediction of inflation is that 5 years out, the inflation fee might be no matter impartial central banks need it to be. Even when elected governments might assist, they’ve loads of critical financial issues to maintain them busy. Maybe they need to begin there.

Tim Harford’s new e-book is ‘ Make the World Add Up

Comply with @FTMag on Twitter to seek out out about our newest tales first

Supply hyperlink