QUESTION: I see the way you had been shocked by your canine in discovering how she research your patterns and predicts the place you’re going. My canine does the identical. I didn’t take note of these traits till you wrote about them. The very trait of the right way to assume is fascinating. Have you ever integrated that into Socrates?
ANSWER: Sure. I had a pal who was a psychologist and he defined to me a few years in the past that there have been two basic kinds of considering in people – linear v dynamic. There’s a good guide written by Richard E. Nisbett entitled “The Geography of Thought, How Asians and Westerners Suppose In a different way … and Why.” He attributed his work to a Chinese language scholar who mentioned: “, the distinction between you and me is that I feel the world is a circle, and also you assume it’s a line.” He goes on to cite him:
The Chinese language consider in fixed change, however with issues all the time shifting again to some prior state. They take note of a variety of occasions; they seek for relationships between issues; and they assume you’ll be able to’t perceive the half with out understanding the entire. Westerners reside in a less complicated, extra deterministic world; they deal with salient objects or folks as an alternative of the bigger image; and they assume they will management occasions as a result of they know the principles that govern the habits of objects.
I can say I by no means needed to clarify cycle idea in Asia to anybody. Within the West, we had been taught to assume linearly. What surprised me about my canine was noticing that she thought dynamically. I had no concept any animal possess such a considering course of. There are canine who even has accomplished simple arithmetic. Understanding how the considering course of works was completely important to have the ability to create any AI program that was practical. Of sure, there have been these making an attempt to create a neural internet, dump all the information in, shake it up, and in some way it might unexplainable to come back forth with the reply. IBM tried that and it failed.
There was simply much more to how we thought that necessitated investigation. Anybody who thinks they can not be taught by observing even how a canine thinks is so biased that they are going to by no means uncover something.