coauthored with Bohdan Kukharskyy at Metropolis College of New York, Anastassia Fedyk at UC Berkeley and Ilona Sologoub at VoxUkraine

Pricey Professor Chomsky,

We’re a gaggle of Ukrainian educational economists who have been grieved by a collection of your current interviews and commentaries on the Russian battle on Ukraine. We consider that your public opinion on this matter is counter-productive to bringing an finish to the unjustified Russian invasion of Ukraine and all of the deaths and struggling it has introduced into our house nation.

Borodyanka, Ukraine, Wednesday, Apr. 6, 2022. Supply: https://apimagesblog.com/russia-ukraine-war-drafts/2022/4/6/day-42-rows-of-body-bags-in-ukraines-bucha

Having familiarized ourselves with the physique of your interviews on this matter, we observed a number of recurring fallacies in your line of argument. In what follows, we want to level out these patterns to you, alongside with our transient response:

Sample #1: Denying Ukraine’s sovereign integrity

In your interview to Jeremy Scahill at The Intercept from April 14, 2022 you claimed: “The very fact of the matter is Crimea is off the desk. We might not prefer it. Crimeans apparently do prefer it.” We want to convey to your consideration a number of historic details:

First, Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014 has violated the Budapest memorandum (wherein it promised to respect and shield Ukrainian borders, together with Crimea), the Treaty on Friendship, Partnership and Cooperation (which it signed with Ukraine in 1997 with the identical guarantees), and, in line with the order of the UN Worldwide Courtroom of Justice, it violated the worldwide legislation.

Second, “Crimeans” isn’t an ethnicity or a cohesive group of individuals – however Crimean Tatars are. These are the indigenous individuals of Crimea, who have been deported by Stalin in 1944 (and have been capable of come again house solely after the united states fell aside), and have been compelled to flee once more in 2014 when Russia occupied Crimea. Of those that stayed, dozens have been persecuted, jailed on false prices and lacking, in all probability lifeless.

Third, if by ‘liking’ you consult with the result of the Crimean “referendum” on March 16, 2014, please word that this “referendum” was held at gunpoint and declared invalid by the Normal Meeting of the United Nations. On the similar time, the vast majority of voters in Crimea supported Ukraine’s independence in 1991.

Sample #2: Treating Ukraine as an American pawn on a geo-political chessboard

Whether or not willingly or unwillingly, your interviews insinuate that Ukrainians are combating with Russians as a result of the U.S. instigated them to take action, that Euromaidan occurred as a result of the U.S. tried to detach Ukraine from the Russian sphere of affect, and many others. Such an angle denies the company of Ukraine and is a slap within the face to thousands and thousands of Ukrainians who’re risking their lives for the need to reside in a free nation. Merely put, have you ever thought-about the chance that Ukrainians want to detach from the Russian sphere of affect as a result of a historical past of genocide, cultural oppression, and fixed denial of the precise to self-determination?

Sample #3. Suggesting that Russia was threatened by NATO

In your interviews, you might be desirous to convey up the alleged promise by [US Secretary of State] James Baker and President George H.W. Bush to Gorbachev that, if he agreed to permit a unified Germany to rejoin NATO, the U.S. would be certain that NATO would transfer ‘not one inch eastward.’ First, please word that the historicity of this promise is extremely contested amongst students, though Russia has been energetic in selling it. The premise is that NATO’s eastward enlargement left Putin with no different alternative however to assault. However the actuality is completely different. Jap European states joined, and Ukraine and Georgia aspired to hitch NATO, with the intention to defend themselves from Russian imperialism. They have been proper of their aspirations, on condition that Russia did assault Georgia in 2008 and Ukraine in 2014. Furthermore, present requests by Finland and Sweden to hitch NATO got here in direct response to  Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, according to NATO enlargement being a consequence of Russian imperialism, and never vice versa.

As well as, we disagree with the notion that sovereign nations shouldn’t be making alliances based mostly on the desire of their individuals due to disputed verbal guarantees made by James Baker and George H.W. Bush to Gorbachev.

Sample #4. Stating that the U.S. isn’t any higher than Russia

Whilst you admittedly name the Russian invasion of Ukraine a “battle crime,” it seems to us that you simply can not achieve this with out naming in the identical breath all the previous atrocities dedicated by the U.S. overseas (e.g., in Iraq or Afghanistan) and, in the end, spending most of your time discussing the latter. As economists, we aren’t able to appropriate your historic metaphors and, evidently, we condemn the unjustified killings of civilians by any energy previously. Nonetheless, not bringing Putin up on battle crime prices on the Worldwide Prison Courtroom within the Hague simply because some previous chief didn’t obtain related remedy can be the improper conclusion to attract from any historic analogy. In distinction, we argue that prosecuting Putin for the battle crimes which can be being intentionally dedicated in Ukraine would set a world precedent for the world leaders making an attempt to do the identical sooner or later.

Sample #5. Whitewashing Putin’s targets for invading Ukraine

In your interviews, you go to nice lengths to rationalize Putin’s targets of “demilitarization” and “neutralization” of Ukraine. Please word that, in his TV tackle from February 24, 2022, marking the start of the battle, the verbatim aim declared by Putin for this “navy operation” is to “denazify” Ukraine. This idea builds on his lengthy pseudo-historical article from July 2021, denying Ukraine’s existence and claiming that Ukrainians weren’t a nation. As elaborated within the ‘denazification handbook’ printed by the Russian official press company RIA Novosti, a “Nazi” is solely a human being who self-identifies as Ukrainian, the institution of a Ukrainian state thirty years in the past was the “Nazification of Ukraine,” and any try to construct such a state needs to be a “Nazi” act. In accordance with this genocide handbook, denazification implies a navy defeat, purging, and population-level “re-education”. ‘Demilitarization’ and ‘neutralization’ indicate the identical aim – with out weapons Ukraine will be unable to defend itself, and Russia will attain its long-term aim of destroying Ukraine.

Sample #6. Assuming that Putin is eager about a diplomatic resolution

All of us very a lot hoped for a cease-fire and a negotiated settlement, which might have saved many human lives. But, we discover it preposterous the way you repeatedly assign the blame for not reaching this settlement to Ukraine (for not providing Putin some “escape hatch”) or the U.S. (for supposedly insisting on the navy moderately than diplomatic resolution) as an alternative of the particular aggressor, who has repeatedly and deliberately bombed civilians, maternity wards, hospitals, and humanitarian corridors throughout these very “negotiations”. Given the escalatory rhetoric (cited above) of the Russian state media, Russia’s aim is erasure and subjugation of Ukraine, not a “diplomatic resolution.”

Sample #7. Advocating that yielding to Russian calls for is the way in which to avert the nuclear battle

For the reason that Russian invasion, Ukraine lives in a relentless nuclear menace, not simply as a result of being a main goal for Russian nuclear missiles but in addition because of the Russian occupation of Ukrainian nuclear energy crops.

However what are the alternate options to combating for freedom? Unconditional give up after which elimination of Ukrainians off the face of the Earth (see above)? Have you ever ever puzzled why President Zelenskyy, with the overwhelming help of the Ukrainian individuals, is pleading with Western leaders to offer heavy weapons regardless of the potential menace of nuclear escalation? The reply to this query isn’t “Due to Uncle Sam”, however moderately as a result of the truth that Russian battle crimes in Bucha and plenty of different Ukrainian cities and villages have proven that dwelling beneath Russian occupation is a tangible “hell on earth” occurring proper now, requiring fast motion.

Arguably, any concessions to Russia won’t scale back the likelihood of a nuclear battle however result in escalation. If Ukraine falls, Russia might assault different nations (Moldova, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Finland or Sweden) and may also use its nuclear blackmail to push the remainder of Europe into submission. And Russia isn’t the one nuclear energy on the earth. Different nations, reminiscent of China, India, Pakistan, and North Korea are watching. Simply think about what is going to occur in the event that they be taught that nuclear powers can get no matter they need utilizing nuclear blackmail.

Professor Chomsky, we hope you’ll think about the details and re-evaluate your conclusions. If you happen to actually worth Ukrainian lives as you declare to, we want to kindly ask you to chorus from including additional gas to the Russian battle machine by spreading views very a lot akin to Russian propaganda.

Do you have to want to interact additional on any of the above-mentioned factors, we’re all the time open to dialogue.

Variety regards,

Bohdan Kukharskyy, Metropolis College of New York

Anastassia Fedyk, College of California, Berkeley

Yuriy Gorodnichenko, College of California, Berkeley

Ilona Sologoub, VoxUkraine NGO



Supply hyperlink